maclariz
maclariz
@ericpre @argerlt so, it's now failing on things that are nothing to do with anything I wrote and are literally unchanged from standard rosettasciio
Thanks @hakonanes . I don't think I could do it my time at the moment but I think if at some point I had a student who was going to...
So, I just had a look at the usage in the paper I just had reviewer comments on. eps was set to 15 degrees (converted to radians). But the 3...
@pc494 took a break for the holidays there. I initially took a naive view that a small misorientation should be sensible, but on some datasets merely ended up with lots...
Thanks @hakonanes . I hope I get some chance to test this soon on the dataset where I had the issues in the past. What is the exact version number...
@hakonanes I have installed in my testing environment, run it on the old data, and found that the symmetry reduction works more reliably on the Silicon misorientations dataset that was...
Sorry to spoil the party, but this new order does not work correctly in reduce for 622 symmetry. Attached is the result of doing cluster analysis using symmetry reduction for...
And now here is the same workbook run with the new method. The results from the old method are quantitatively sensible. The new method is screwy. So, something about your...
> @ericpre and @maclariz this is based on #412, and (I think?) properly credits all the commits from that branch. I think I'm going to slightly redo the git history...
@harripj @hakonanes any thoughts?