Mat Kelly

@phonedude Assuming we have a date for a URI-R, how do you imagine Mink should respond?

Bumping to a future milestone for further consideration.

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19294981/how-to-find-the-version-of-chrome-browser-from-my-extension https://developer.chrome.com/extensions/runtime Per @ibnesayeed, "Make it easy to parse, something like [custom user agent]".

Why square brackets, of all characters? I am open to doing it for the sake of parsing logs.

So, would the following suffice? Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2228.0 Safari/537.36 [Mink/1.4.1]

That could be done and I understand your rationale now (I think). Once you parse out the [.*], you want to be able to get system/browser information without having to...

Via jQuery, which I am using for the Ajax requests to the aggregator, I attempted a simple: ``` javascript $.ajaxSetup({ beforeSend: function(request) { request.setRequestHeader("User-Agent","ThisIsATest"); } }); ``` then proceed with...

`webRequest` allows the modifications to be conditional on a certain URI format, which we could specify memgator.cs.odu.edu:1208/\* to only contain the user agent modifications.

@ibnesayeed , I did not see a http://github.com/oduwsdl/memgator ticket related to the logging. Without this, it's a little harder to reliably test what is being received server side from Mink...

@ibnesayeed What was the reason for Mink sending a modified User-Agent, btw? I'm going to lower the priority on this ticket, since there is nothing in-place on the receiving end...