Mark Abraham

Tested on LRZ cluster

@junghans You can merge, I can't

> On a second look, there's one issue in pipelines: https://gitlab.spack.io/spack/spack/-/jobs/12339802 Unlikely related to this MR. Is that configuration working reliably for other PRs?

@alalazo https://gitlab.spack.io/spack/spack/-/jobs/12342276#L112 looks like some preliminary download failed, so I guess that's why the compiler wasn't functional. Any ideas?

> @mabraham That seems to be retried and ok 2 lines below. The real error seems https://gitlab.spack.io/spack/spack/-/jobs/12342276#L486 Indeed, but that makes no sense if all the change is doing is...

So #46050 has net no changes, and passes all CI, so maybe plumed 2.9.1 somehow has broken exactly this configuration. Weird. I don't see anything in their release notes https://www.plumed.org/doc-v2.9/user-doc/html/_c_h_a_n_g_e_s-2-9.html...

> > @GiovanniBussi any suggestions? > > Hi, where can I see the failure? Is this it [this](https://github.com/spack/spack/pull/46022#issuecomment-2310524894)? It would be quite puzzling. Can you confirm that 2.9.0 can build...

> I've now made an unrelated real PR to the GROMACS recipe (#46065), which might uncover whether that build image is working for plumed 2.9.0 Nope, that didn't rebuild the...

GROMACS 2024.4 is expected to release later this week, at which point we can make a spack PR that will definitely trigger all configurations, and thereby learn something here.

> GROMACS 2024.4 is expected to release later this week, at which point we can make a spack PR that will definitely trigger all configurations, and thereby learn something here....