Licensing differs between the content of LICENSE and the 'license' property of package.json

[RA80533]

LICENSE contains the text of the Apache License 2.0 while the 'license' property of package.json indicates that the project is licensed under the terms of the MIT License.

Suggestion

One of the following should be implemented:

1. README.md should be updated to contain information regarding the complexities of the project's licensing if the project is indeed licensed using some combination of both the Apache License 2.0 and the MIT License
2. The 'license' property of package.json should be changed to correspond with the content of the license file