Lukasz Wasylow

Hi I believe the installation was not followed successfully. All the framework object are given public grants. Any new users should access the main objects to run tests. Can you...

Hi @ekumpe can you confirm if you resolved issue?

Hi @markhawker76 The functionality you describing is a feature of dbms coverage which we don't use fully. We are mainly using profiler and running dbms coverage as supplemental data. We...

Hi @wwl13 Can you provide the equivalent of command please? Is that causing any functionality issues?

Why can't this be simple beforeall and afterall procedures depending on requirements on suite, context or procedure? It's sounds like we don't getting any functionality other than wrapping existing procedures...

This is duplicate #1028 As for data driven current approach is debatable but more likely I would be inclined to implement parameters and let users create own data tables if...

Hi @markhawker76 Would you be so kind and provide and sample example of the test you want to do ? I'm not sure I understand the problem. The snippet above...

Hi Mark It's been a while since look at the code but looking in tests (https://github.com/utPLSQL/utPLSQL/blob/develop/test/ut3_tester/core/annotations/test_annot_throws_exception.pkb) I can see that you don't need to define the pragma for that to...

I allowed myself to correct your post @jgebal as the word `fale` got me really confused :P I totally agree that a new flag called `disabled_reason` would be best way.

Will try that , thanks.