Lucas van der Meer

If this problem still persists with the newer versions, please re-open this issue. For now I close it.

Hi @nlebovits, unfortunately the package was recently archived on CRAN because of a failing test. We are currently in the process of re-submitting, so it should be back there soon....

It is a weird result, but I am not sure if I find it unexpected. The question is mainly: what should the morpher do when an edge crosses itself, which...

Yes, I did implement it in an early function of to_spatial_smooth, but it was not working good and also very slow. Therefore it did not make it to master. Is...

Implemented in v0.6.0 through arugment `require_equal`, see https://luukvdmeer.github.io/sfnetworks/articles/sfn02_preprocess_clean.html#smooth-pseudo-nodes

@psychemedia Thanks for raising this! I think either a vignette or blogpost presenting such a workflow (starting with querying data from OSM and ending with a clean network) would be...

This is a quite unusual case, since normally you would not have several nodes at the same location. I'll mark it as low priority, but it is still a bug...

> Hence, sooner or later I think we should remove the code that compares the equality of numerical values Yes, I would even put it high on the priority list...

Thanks @agila5! Interesting approach, did not think before of doing it like that. Personally I am a bit reluctant to include the `data.table` dependency, since we already have quite some...

Thanks @mpadge that looks great! One question I have: the default precision you use (i.e. `1e-10`), do you know if this is a commonly used default for such equality checks,...