Results 114 comments of Lukasz Stafiniak

Or maybe not, for the simplest "k+1 dimensional" cases there's a workaround using fixed indexing.

Bumping this, combined with retrieving settings via `get_global_arg` (which checks commandline, environment vars, and a config file).

This shouldn't be the _default_ settings, but the settings retrieved by `get_global_arg`.

We have great support for settings now, with settings files.

This is not a viable backend candidate (not flexible enough).

I thought of supporting numerical logging in ppx_minidebug, it's one direction of resolving this issue.

W&B is the gold standard. Some ideas outside the Weights and Biases space: - [Ketrew: Keep Track of Experimental Workflows](https://github.com/hammerlab/ketrew), not machine-learning specific, but an OCaml library already, might turn...

https://github.com/johnma2006/mamba-minimal

The refactor is done for a long time now, but there's plenty work to make `arrayjit` a viable library -- dedicated tests, printing, possibly refactoring shape inference also? Not sure...

It's not an independent package, but it is a separate opam package... That's good enough. The original issue title does not say "independent".