Lukasz Cwik
Lukasz Cwik
No, worries. Hopefully you had a good vacation.
I see that BEAM-14534 does specifically mention using a wrapping coder to compress the data and I think it would still be a better solution since it would allow you...
> > The other part of the change makes sense to reduce byte[] copies by using ByteString. > > CC: @tudorm > > Maybe I'll pull the ByteString refactoring stuff...
> Is this blocked on #17802 ? Yes, it is the precursor.
Have you tried the pipeline visitor using a SnappyCoder that wraps existing encodings?
> > Have you tried the pipeline visitor using a SnappyCoder that wraps existing encodings? > > now that we have compression working well end-to-end in our internal fork (and...
Any updates on using the pipeline visitor vs this approach?
R: @emilymye @jigga
Run Spotless PreCommit
Run SQL PreCommit