Łukasz Mitka

bad bot. Still needed.

> Are willing to work on this and open a pr? No, sorry, no time to spare.

bad bot

@cpanato Could you set an [exempt-issue-labels](https://github.com/actions/stale#exempt-issue-labels) for these kind of issues?

> Can you show a comparison with and without this setting? No, sorry. To busy to play around with it. But scenario is: multiple builds, up to 1GB for each...

Sorry, wasn't trying to be rude, just direct. > based on gut feelings IMO using timestamp seems to be a 'gut feeling' of someone. I'd love to be proven wrong....

> [Cache Hits and Misses](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/caching-dependencies-to-speed-up-workflows#cache-hits-and-misses) That's very interesting, but it works a bit differently than described. Cache get saved even after cache hit. Log extract: ```log # SETUP Run hendrikmuhs/ccache-action@fba817f3c0db4f854d7a3ee688241d6754da166e...

It's been a month since I'm running 'no timestamp' in a couple of repos. No issues noticed and no complaints from devs. @hendrikmuhs please consider reopening this issue and making...

@Imeguras how did I do that?

@zed0 Can we get this fixed? #27 may be fixing it.