lukasdreyer
lukasdreyer
Thank you for bringing this bug to our attention. I have created a branch with a possible fix: https://github.com/DLR-AMR/t8code/pull/863. Does this resolve your problem?
The bugfix #863 should solve the inconsistencies with `t8_forest_element_face_normal`, but it brought to light another problem that you might stumble upon: The node and face enumeration are different for the...
Replaced by New feature label, since we now abort with error message
This is already worked on in #768
@Davknapp Did you verify, that this is now fixed with the pyramid volume bugfix?
> `mpirun -np 8 ./t8_advection -u7 -l0 -r1 -f cube -d3 -C0.5 -b4 -X-0.7 -Y0 -Z0 -R0.3 -T1` The documentation for `u7` says: 7 - Flow past a rotating cylinder...
Discussion point: Can we use the same range (e.g. 2015-2023) for all files? Also pinging @holke for input.
First thing that I stumbled upon: The function `t8_cmesh_add_attributes` is called by `t8_cmesh_commit_replicated_new` and `t8_cmesh_commit_partitioned_new`, so for me it looks like the comment ``` /* attribute->id is a gloidx that...
I think I need a highlevel overview of the capabilities that `t8_cmesh_commit_partitioned_new` should have. From my current understanding, the problem arises, because the attributes of ghost trees are not partitioned...
The first post was more of an observation, that it seemed to me that some functionality, that was originally planned for the replicated case, was also used for the partitioned...