Luís Gonçalves

You'd need to create a new class derived from the abstract `KeyStoreKeyingDataProvider`... Anyway, I guess we can go forward with this.

I've been looking through the stack trace and googling a bit... It seems that Guice uses a lot of reflection (and maybe code generation?) in runtime, which may be the...

OK, it it really seems related to byte-code generation: https://github.com/google/guice/wiki/OptionalAOP. They mention "cglib" in the AOP version, which is part of the code path in the stack trace.., I think...

I was looking a bit more into this: - xades4j depends on Guice multibindings, which depends on Guice (with AOP). - Tried including the no-AOP version explicitly but started getting...

Did you have any issues with upgrading Guice? I'm not much into existing XML libraries.. I don't know if there is an easy replacement (with code generation et al to...

@lexboss93 this is a tricky one, mostly due to JAXB issues reported by @treekt. The Guice AOP/multibindings problem could probably be worked around by changing the internal DI configuration, but...

Hi Guillermo, The library was initially designed without fully considering extended forms. For instance, it is possible to extend a XAdES-C signature to XAdES -X-L upon verification, but not to...

The patches have not been applied to the code base so xades4j doesn't support X-L. In addition, the patches were not revised.

Unfortunately I can't say it's planned. I'd like to add that support as well as other aspects discussed with Hubert (the developer that submitted the patches), but I haven't been...

Hello @leonardoavs, this issue isn't closed because X-L support is not completely integrated in the lib. Work from community developers over time has been merged in #146 into the `xades-x-l-a`...