luckytyphlosion

Is that really possible to enforce while matching?

`GymmickUnion` is at least one example of passing around a union itself. So it does exist in the code.

I have realized that labelling all unions with a Union suffix may not be the right choice. Consider this union for example. ```c typedef union Quaternion_AsMtxF44 { struct { f32...

Issue name shouldn't be an implementation task when consensus hasn't been decided.

A few things I should mention: - Local labels can be made possible with GNU tools. There are two options for this: - [Use my custom fork of GNU assembler](https://github.com/luckytyphlosion/agbcc/tree/new_layout_with_libs)...

> Are you sure both assemblers are compatible enough anyway? Stick to whatever mwasmarm supports for the time being. Only matters for trainer AI, all other scripts are assembled and...

pfero — Today at 12:49 AM > Also re local labels > Does mwasmarm support gas-style numbered labels? > As in > ``` > 1: > thing 1f @jumps forward...

 Seems like current consensus is probably: 1. Command name styling: `PascalCase` 2. Entry-point label styling: `PascalCase` 3. Use local labels: No (gcc-incompatible means local labels are not tenable) 4....

I abstain from this discussion.

There is actually a third variant C: case labels indented by 1, but case contents not indented. ``` switch (state) { case 0: // ... case 1: // ... }...