Paw-Issues
Paw-Issues copied to clipboard
luckymarmot
Websocket support
Yeah I'd definitely use websocket and graphql support, most of our API's are on Lambda and we use web sockets quite a bit with mobile apps.
Was this ever introduced? I found an comment from May '17 saying that it might be on the way so just wanted to check... thanks!
Meanwhile use: https://websocketking.com
(for people like me who needed to do a quick websocket test and noticed Paw didn't support it)
Err, you do realize that there are people asking a question here that BUY a Paw license and would hope for some kind of response?
use Postman, I removed my subscription for PAW because I'm not paying for a product that is quite clearly not supported properly - PAW WAS awesome in my book, but it's not the winner - also this is not a complicated feature, I don't quite understand why it's hard work engaging on it.
I mean common this was nearly a year ago?!
It should be noted that this repo is being closed and there is a link on Readme for raising tickets though, so it might better to migrate our requests to here as this repo might not even be observed any more. Here is the link from the readme.
https://paw.cloud/support?app=com.luckymarmot.Paw
It should be noted that this repo is being closed and there is a link on Readme for raising tickets though, so it might better to migrate our requests to here as this repo might not even be observed any more. Here is the link from the readme.
https://paw.cloud/support?app=com.luckymarmot.Paw
That's not an excuse for the team not addressing the request and the many votes casted on it. I think giving an official statement on how existing issues will be handled before closing and abandoning the repo is the appropriate action.
Whilst I do agree, during transition periods between orgs, things can get lost, now being annoyed is not going to change the facts, finding a solution will.
We can troll this thread all year, not gonna make a difference, being angry only really changes your life - whilst we're entitled to feel aggrieved I don't believe the software owners want to lose subscribers, I believe they made a mistake, as have we all, so let's figure this out.
To be blunt, if we could make this ourselves we wouldn't be here, so you have two choices, don't be here. Or engage. I think I'll select engage given I hadn't noticed the change of ownership.
Had the pro version so far, apparently which isn't required anymore. Web socket not yet present. Switching to Firecamp for good
