Luca Bruno

Hi and welcome! I'm not super-familiar with that specific option in the treefile, but I have a feeling that the `sepolicy` value may be coming from here: https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/blob/06b70045a5a94a3fe83fc6f2cfc7a82fe25da1a8/src/app/rpmostree-compose-builtin-tree.cxx#L454-L458 But overall...

On the other hand, having this as a slice of `u8` makes the usage of the safe `CStr` constructor simpler (and portable): https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ffi/struct.CStr.html#method.from_bytes_with_nul.

I guess this is a duplicate of https://github.com/serde-rs/serde/issues/642.

Cross-referencing https://github.com/Keats/validator/issues/22. It looks like one of the main concerns there is how to bubble up structured/detailed errors when validation/finalization fails. If anybody has usecases/opinions, it would be nice to...

That was unfortunately broken when the `coreos.com` accounts got moved to Red Hat. With some luck, I may be able to find an archived copy of it, maybe.

Thanks, that would be much appreciated! If you want a comparison with native bindings for another language (Rust), there is this one still in fly: https://github.com/lucab/libsystemd-rs/pull/98

This seems to be working fine both in my local environment (go1.15.5) and in CI: https://github.com/coreos/go-systemd/runs/1412766487?check_suite_focus=true.

> I think that the JobNew() and JobRemoved() D-Bus signals can be used to listen to this I'm not very familiar with that portion of the systemd DBus API, but...

I think this effectively means moving the module to `v23`, i.e. a major breaking change. I'm not fully against it, but it is going to introduce a huge churn across...

Hi and thanks for the report! Sorry for the dependency loop, I think we can easily manage to break it. However I'm not convinced about moving dlopen to go-systemd, as...