Lee Spector

Trying to catch up quickly on enumerators... just read some of the thread above... looks great. I think Tom's more recent experience adding types will make it easier for him...

Maybe helps to clarify in a different way (?): When @thelmuth says "we _force_ `exec_if` to be followed by two code blocks" he means that the Plush->Push translation process will...

> Another crazy thought: what if we had a :function stack? The functions would be blocks of code with > input and output types, and would execute in their own...

I just copied Tom's description above to the Orientation category of push-language.hampshire.edu.

Thanks. This is a known issue that's noted at the top of the file (with a spelling error, alas). It should be fixed or moved back to /experimental, where it...

Supposedly fixed, but I've only tested that it doesn't raise an exception. I think that Frode (a student in my group), who updated this after the Plush transition, only claimed...

I don't even think I agree. My first reaction was that neither `nil` nor `make-push-state` is a push state (although `(make-push-state)` is), so you shouldn't be calling `top-item` on them...

I agree that `:no-such-stack` would be a more helpful reply if there really is no such stack; that strikes me as a good change to make. On the idea of...

> On Jun 30, 2015, at 10:38 PM, Tom Helmuth [email protected] wrote: > > Not sure if you have any solutions in mind, but adding metadata to those instructions seems...

I think my vote will be to use new names for the functions for which the old names are inappropriate, but keep the old names for the functions for which...