Lokesh Mandvekar

> @lsm5 reported two PRs [first](https://github.com/containers/podman/pull/24369/files#diff-2b4300f6d69654fd71c0cdd329b5a5f13fa8fe7eb709c76276bdfd3ea1dde578R91-R116) and [second](https://github.com/containers/podman/pull/24747) where packit triggered tests even though labels were absent (and the other way around in the first link). In the latest run...

@jnovy @rhatdan @Luap99 @mheon PTAL

Strange, lack of iptables is causing centos-stream-9 failures on https://github.com/containers/container-selinux/pull/321/checks?check_run_id=27912263135 but it's not causing rhel-9 failures. centos 9 stream does seem to pull in libnftnl,libpcap and nftables but rhel9 does...

> Also I still think we must move this requires over to netavark for at least RHEL 10 and newer, c-common is really the wrong place for that IMO Yup,...

https://github.com/containers/netavark/pull/1033 has now merged. Given we have netavark v1.12 expected next week, I'll include a change next week to bump the min netavark version as well in the containers-common rpm....

@TomSweeneyRedHat @rhatdan @Luap99 I would like to bump the netavark dependency to 1.12.0 (ETA tomorrow IIUC) in the rpm spec file for containers-common and have a new c/common v0.60.1 with...

> @TomSweeneyRedHat @rhatdan @Luap99 I would like to bump the netavark dependency to 1.12.0 (ETA tomorrow IIUC) in the rpm spec file for containers-common and have a new c/common v0.60.1...

> I think this is good to merge now as the recent netavark versions are already in stable fedora now, @lsm5 agree? I'd say so. netavark spec file in upstream...

Seen at https://github.com/containers/container-libs/pull/4/checks?check_run_id=48014971351

@ericcurtin @rhatdan we're able to access gpu instances via TMT and that can be verified through the TMT log. See `/test/tmt/gpu_info` results in the tmt log. Check `Show passed tests`...