Łukasz Ślusarczyk

Distributed Ranges branch is ready to be reviewed by oneDPL developers. It passed all existing oneDPL CI tasks: https://github.com/oneapi-src/oneDPL/actions/runs/9128713306 It passed our tests executed by CI running in our repo...

@akukanov It seems we addressed all comments that you had so far. Are there more comments? If not, then could we please work toward merging this code to main branch?...

> This is a first pass with higher-level comments. @julianmi , thank you for review. I've applied and answered all your comments. Please resolve discussions which you think I addressed...

@julianmi , I've applied unresolved discussions from yesterday. Please check if all is ok now and resolve what is ok.

@akukanov , all, Here is [documentation of Distributed-Ranges API](https://oneapi-src.github.io/distributed-ranges/spec/index.html) which you may both use as a help during review and you may review it itself checking if it is clear...

> A couple of comments regarding the CI. @julianmi , thank you for your valuable comments. In https://github.com/oneapi-src/oneDPL/pull/1663 PR I've refactored Distributed Ranges CI to be tested in the same...

@danhoeflinger , thank you for the review and valuable comments. I've applied or answered all of them except https://github.com/oneapi-src/oneDPL/pull/1479#discussion_r1670894363 , which needs some more work and experiments from my side...

> In this PR we have a lot of destructors, declared as `= default`. I understand why we need that in case when destructor also declared as `virtual`. But for...