Gerwin Klein

Logging here that enabling `clang` for `TX1` shows the same issue on that platform.

Not sure which project you mean is dead, but I'm not going to add an Emitter change with just the explanation "optimisation" without any benchmarks, use case or anything else...

Still around, just not always with a lot of time. Sorry I was sounding a bit annoyed, PRs with subtle changes to the runtime engine like this one take an...

Alternatively: allow lookahead in macros and at any nesting level syntactically, but add a check in the semantic checking phase that rules out expressions where lookahead is not used at...

This does indeed look like a bug, thanks for reporting it. But it's mostly a bug in error reporting (sorry :-)). Enabling the use of macros in character classes like...

I can take a look later and trace this through the Haskell. @bennoleslie might be right that if we have decided to truncate at this point, we might as well...

Ok, I finally figured out the reason for this. In the spec and Haskell, there is a single function `getMRs` that is used both in the decode path where it...

I guess the question remains if we should change it. I think it would make sense. Would need some verification effort, but probably not a huge amount.

> > Ok, I finally figured out the reason for this. In the spec and Haskell, there is a single function `getMRs` that is used both in the decode path...

One possible change would be to add a separate (in some ways redundant) check to the spec and bail out early on that separate check. That'd be a bit strange...