Louis Pilfold
Louis Pilfold
Of the two approaches I think I prefer the rename one, though it would be nice to have support actually built in to LSP. I'm hoping this will come as...
We wouldn't use aliases, we would use module names, for they are unambiguous. Both proposals are extremely unintuitive. I would not expect anyone to be able to discover either, users...
Agreed. I'm not sure how we can do this as serde controls these errors, but it'd be great to improve of this.
Hello! Are you still working on this one? :)
No worries @clr-cera ! Thank you again. I'll close this, and anyone looking at the linked PR in future can reference thisone.
Could be useful! So would it change `prop1:,` to `prop1: _`? Is there a reason to limit it to labelled arguments? Seems like being able to ignore any unused variable...
Makes sense! Let's do the more general one :)
Looks like there's a snapshot that needs to be accepted!
Oh dear, that's unfortunate. Perhaps we make `:utf8` work like `:utf8_codepoint` but emit a warning? And then make `:utf8` an error in Gleam v2? What do you think?
What shall we do here? Do we need to have a discussion somewhere?