Louis Pilfold
Louis Pilfold
Do we have a way to move forward here? I think we could remove the logical/boolean split perhaps and just say that in Gleam it always wants bools
Agreed. Try and keep it simple.
Wonderful, thank you! I wonder if [the language tour](https://tour.gleam.run/) might be the most impactful thing to translate
It would be good to make some more structured way of making these, to ensure they all cover the same topics. How could we do that?
Editing via GitHub is fine, the authors will be programmers. More I want them all to cover the same basic topics as a minimum, and I want it to be...
Thanks for the information! I like the idea of dividing a Gleam project into parts, each with their own private and public modules. One thing I am not sure of...
Yes definitely Peter! I can't decide on a syntax though for that one. Ideas very much welcome
This proposal doesn't fit well with Gleam at present because we don't have a middle system in which a project name is the root and everything is nested from there....
> it's normally a good idea to only have one top level module This is the approach in Elixir and Ruby but is not the approach in Elm, Haskell or...