uptime-kuma
uptime-kuma copied to clipboard
louislam
DNS Overwrite/Assignment for URL in Monitoring
⚠️ Please verify that this feature request has NOT been suggested before.
- [X] I checked and didn't find similar feature request
🏷️ Feature Request Type
Other
🔖 Feature description
I have a domain (let's say www.example.com) redirected to a local host device (let's say 10.10.10.15) on my router so I can access my service quickly when I connect to my local network, but I may want to check it's public ip (let's say 123.123.123.123) for service availability matters, I've got jump/reversed proxy for that port mapping it to public.
✔️ Solution
I'd like to have an option for overwrite server ip address without changing the dns server it self.
❓ Alternatives
No response
📝 Additional Context
No response
This would be a great feature to add to the project!
Great tool overall!
I am also looking for a similar option.
I know it's possible to do a similar 'outside check' through a proxy. But finding a free proxy to do that check is annoying and they never live long enough to make it useful through uptime-kuma.
The possibility to bypass the docker DNS, would make it easier to be able to check local DNS and remote DNS for a service.
I'm also looking for this feature! I want to customize the DNS for each HTTP type of monitor to differentiate between internal and external networks.
@Lakr233
You can do that with the tools currently at your disposal:
- you enter the ip into the url field
- you enter the
Hostheader as described in https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/issues/2991
I think this is a duplicate of https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/issues/2991 https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/issues/3979 If you agree, could you please close this Issue, as duplicates only create immortal zombies and are really hard to issue-manage? If not, what makes this issue unique enough to require an additional issue? (Could this be integrated into the issue linked above?) ^^
Note that our contribution guide can be found here and that we are open to contributions if you adhere to this
@CommanderStorm Thank you for providing this level of detail, and I have confirmed that it is working as expected.