Lori A. Burns

> Sounds good on first glance; I'm sorry, but I don't have the bandwidth right now to check out that #233 PR Sure, no problem. #233 isn't ready for trial...

> @loriab CI passes! Thanks! > How painful would be to revert to cmake 3.16? It won't be too bad. I figured I'd keep it at 3.18 for int_am readability...

Sorry to leave CI broken after you so kindly fixed it. This shows a strategy for separating machine-path-dependent targets (that you described the need for but are unsuitable for distribution)...

> BTW I am not sure I understand why we need to have the "nonlocal" (path-independent) targets. If you allow the user to discover Eigen3 on their own or provide...

> @loriab btw I made the int-cxx-{static,shared} a compiled library. The header-only (interface) version is int-cxx-headeronly-{static,shared}. Good, thanks, it'll be nice to look at something concrete. If both `int-cxx-headeronly-{static,shared}` and...

@evaleev, this PR isn't ready for review yet, but if you have a chance, I'd appreciate if you could look over this docs table https://github.com/loriab/libint/blob/new-cmake-harness-lab-rb1/INSTALL.md#prerequisites and footnotes for correctness. I'm...

@evaleev, I think this is ready for review. I'm still working on the INSTALL.md docs, but I'm satisfied with the technical situation. If you approve of the general structure and...

Since it's possible that Max and Andy are working from my 2019 fork of L2 for cmake, I just re-ran the test file on #233 that has been re-synced to...

Very true, psi4 doesn't take advantage of r12 integrals and so the cmake doesn't build it. But the last time I checked on fedora or ubuntu (don't remember which) other...

If it's any help, the Azure CI of [this project](https://github.com/psi4/psi4) is building Libint v1 on Windows (clang-flavored, though).