Loïc Lecrenier
Loïc Lecrenier
I am glad to hear that it appears to be resolved! And don't worry about wasting our time. It is always better to report bugs and you clearly put effort...
@gmourier Sure, it's technically possible :) The main challenge would be in making a good API for it.
This **might** be fixed by https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/pull/3542 . But it would be good to test it again once Meilisearch v1.2 is released
Hi @jinyus, Thanks for the bug report, I could indeed reproduce the issue. It's a mistake that a synonym is often treated as equally relevant to its original word. And...
Fixed by https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/pull/3542 :-)
Hi @UncaughtCursor, thanks for the bug report :) I am currently investigating the issue. I will update you on the progress here 🙂
I had the opportunity to monitor a Meilisearch instance experiencing similar (but not identical) problems. While there is no definitive explanation for this behaviour, I did find a few potential...
Hi @geoffreybr, Thanks for weighing in on this issue 😄 I mostly agree with you! I also suspect that, for some use cases, the positions of the query's words within...
@geoffreybr The `attribute:no-position` solution was also one I had in mind, although I haven't talked about it with the rest of the team yet. I can also imagine someone might...
The main issue of `make attribute ranking rule fuzzy` was fixed by https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch/pull/3542 . We are also now capable, technically, to implement ranking rules such as the ones I described...