ln2max
ln2max
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 11:44:45AM -0700, Roman Zeyde wrote: >Thanks for reporting this issue! > >electrs fee estimation works by inspecting the node's mempool transaction fee bands, similar...
@TNTBOMBOM your advice to "go to debian repositories and change them from bullseye to buster in /etc/apt/sources.list" is potentially very harmful. This results in all new installations on the user's...
Hi Vladimir, is this relevant to https://github.com/flashrom/flashrom/issues/185 ?
Just saw this (my email client misfiled it with the flashrom email list traffic)... will take a look shortly!
Here is another flashrom patch implementing this feature which never got merged (!): https://mail.coreboot.org/pipermail/flashrom/2016-July/014717.html https://mail.coreboot.org/pipermail/flashrom/2016-July/014737.html https://mail.coreboot.org/pipermail/flashrom/2016-July/014738.html overarching writeup here: https://blogs.coreboot.org/blog/2016/08/26/gsoc-sr-wp-otp-wrap-up-12/ flashrom code including @hatimak patches appears to be here: https://github.com/hatimak/flashrom/tree/dev...
> I also tested this on a GD25**B**128B -- note that this chip does not have a WP# pin at all! There is no hardware write protect! The goggles!!! Only...
> Minimally tested with a GD25LQ128C/GD25LQ128D in a corebooted KGPE-D16 using "-p internal": I don't have a Gigadevice / GD* chip to test this on, unfortunately. (And it's not in...
> Also, please note that every flashrom operation, **including "verify",** will actually attempt to modify the lock bits. In particular it will try to clear them. So you absolutely must...
On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 04:33:40PM +0000, a-m-joseph wrote: >No no, the attack here is that the chip is swapped before the victim buys the laptop. They buy it,...
On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 02:06:41PM -0700, a-m-joseph wrote: >The Bloomberg story requires custom chip manufacturing. And quite advanced IC packaging as well. > >What shocked me about the...