Lan Xia

@yukiyuli thanks for your PR. Please update your PR title and description to reflect the change in your PR. Please refer [Commit message example](https://github.com/adoptium/aqa-tests/blob/master/Contributing.md) for details. Thanks.

Thanks @yukiyuli for the update. A couple of issues: - Please update PR title and description:  - Please remove the previously merged commit from this PR https://github.com/adoptium/aqa-tests/pull/4029

I think there may be a reason that we keep `jdk11_tier1_buffer` in sanity level. Could you just remove `$(Q)$(JTREG_JDK_TEST_DIR)/java/nio/Buffer$(Q)` from `jdk_nio`?

@smlambert @sophia-guo any preference? I think we have `jdk11_tier1_buffer` at the sanity level because it is part of tier1. By removing this target, we will run `jdk11_tier1_buffer` at the extended...

@sophia-guo Do you mean to contribute the change to the OpenJDK repo or our mirror repo? If we just make a change in our mirror repo, we need to make...

Ideally, we should not have any duplication. However, we would like to keep tier1 at the sanity level as we run them nightly. The extended level often runs weekly due...

@sendaoYan May I know if there are other reasons for removing the `jdk11_tier1_buffer` except it is a duplication?

The change is delivered via https://github.com/adoptium/aqa-tests/pull/4036

re https://github.com/adoptium/adoptium/issues/181#issuecomment-1285341362, I think this is a known issue https://github.com/adoptium/aqa-tests/issues/4049

I agree. We only need to download JVM to run TKG when PARALLEL=Dynamic. In other parallel cases (i.e., NodesByIterations, Subdir), we do not need to download JVM and clone test...