[DAGCombiner] Fix assertion failure in vector division lowering
Recent fixes in division legalization trip the legality assertion when NewNodesMustHaveLegalTypes is set.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-selectiondag
Author: Valeriy Savchenko (SavchenkoValeriy)
Changes
Recent fixes in division legalization trip the legality assertion when NewNodesMustHaveLegalTypes is set.
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/172321.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp (+31-4)
- (added) llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/vector-div-by-promoted-const-no-assertion.ll (+86)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
index bf26fec287636..69120114fb78f 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/TargetLowering.cpp
@@ -6559,6 +6559,19 @@ SDValue TargetLowering::BuildSDIV(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
if (N->getFlags().hasExact())
return BuildExactSDIV(*this, N, dl, DAG, Created);
+ // If we're after type legalization and SVT is not legal, use the
+ // promoted type for creating constants to avoid creating nodes with
+ // illegal types.
+ if (IsAfterLegalTypes && VT.isVector()) {
+ SVT = getTypeToTransformTo(*DAG.getContext(), SVT);
+ if (SVT.bitsLT(VT.getScalarType()))
+ return SDValue();
+ ShSVT = getTypeToTransformTo(*DAG.getContext(), ShSVT);
+ if (ShSVT.bitsLT(ShVT.getScalarType()))
+ return SDValue();
+ }
+ const unsigned SVTBits = SVT.getSizeInBits();
+
SmallVector<SDValue, 16> MagicFactors, Factors, Shifts, ShiftMasks;
auto BuildSDIVPattern = [&](ConstantSDNode *C) {
@@ -6585,7 +6598,8 @@ SDValue TargetLowering::BuildSDIV(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
NumeratorFactor = -1;
}
- MagicFactors.push_back(DAG.getConstant(magics.Magic, dl, SVT));
+ MagicFactors.push_back(
+ DAG.getConstant(magics.Magic.sext(SVTBits), dl, SVT));
Factors.push_back(DAG.getSignedConstant(NumeratorFactor, dl, SVT));
Shifts.push_back(DAG.getConstant(magics.ShiftAmount, dl, ShSVT));
ShiftMasks.push_back(DAG.getSignedConstant(ShiftMask, dl, SVT));
@@ -6736,6 +6750,19 @@ SDValue TargetLowering::BuildUDIV(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
// avoid expensive fixups.
unsigned KnownLeadingZeros = DAG.computeKnownBits(N0).countMinLeadingZeros();
+ // If we're after type legalization and SVT is not legal, use the
+ // promoted type for creating constants to avoid creating nodes with
+ // illegal types.
+ if (IsAfterLegalTypes && VT.isVector()) {
+ SVT = getTypeToTransformTo(*DAG.getContext(), SVT);
+ if (SVT.bitsLT(VT.getScalarType()))
+ return SDValue();
+ ShSVT = getTypeToTransformTo(*DAG.getContext(), ShSVT);
+ if (ShSVT.bitsLT(ShVT.getScalarType()))
+ return SDValue();
+ }
+ const unsigned SVTBits = SVT.getSizeInBits();
+
bool UseNPQ = false, UsePreShift = false, UsePostShift = false;
SmallVector<SDValue, 16> PreShifts, PostShifts, MagicFactors, NPQFactors;
@@ -6758,7 +6785,7 @@ SDValue TargetLowering::BuildUDIV(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
UnsignedDivisionByConstantInfo::get(
Divisor, std::min(KnownLeadingZeros, Divisor.countl_zero()));
- MagicFactor = DAG.getConstant(magics.Magic, dl, SVT);
+ MagicFactor = DAG.getConstant(magics.Magic.zext(SVTBits), dl, SVT);
assert(magics.PreShift < Divisor.getBitWidth() &&
"We shouldn't generate an undefined shift!");
@@ -6769,8 +6796,8 @@ SDValue TargetLowering::BuildUDIV(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
PreShift = DAG.getConstant(magics.PreShift, dl, ShSVT);
PostShift = DAG.getConstant(magics.PostShift, dl, ShSVT);
NPQFactor = DAG.getConstant(
- magics.IsAdd ? APInt::getOneBitSet(EltBits, EltBits - 1)
- : APInt::getZero(EltBits),
+ magics.IsAdd ? APInt::getOneBitSet(SVTBits, EltBits - 1)
+ : APInt::getZero(SVTBits),
dl, SVT);
UseNPQ |= magics.IsAdd;
UsePreShift |= magics.PreShift != 0;
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/vector-div-by-promoted-const-no-assertion.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/vector-div-by-promoted-const-no-assertion.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..707ae0759d4f4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/vector-div-by-promoted-const-no-assertion.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5
+; RUN: llc -mtriple=aarch64-pc-windows-msvc < %s | FileCheck %s
+
+target datalayout = "e-m:w-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-p:64:64-i32:32-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128-Fn32"
+target triple = "aarch64-pc-windows-msvc"
+
+; udiv with zext input - the zext from i8 to i16 triggers vector splitting
+; which exposes the promoted constant issue
+define <16 x i16> @udiv_v16i16_from_zext(<16 x i8> %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: udiv_v16i16_from_zext:
+; CHECK: // %bb.0: // %entry
+; CHECK-NEXT: mov w8, #21846 // =0x5556
+; CHECK-NEXT: ushll2 v1.8h, v0.16b, #0
+; CHECK-NEXT: ushll v0.8h, v0.8b, #0
+; CHECK-NEXT: dup v2.8h, w8
+; CHECK-NEXT: umull2 v3.4s, v1.8h, v2.8h
+; CHECK-NEXT: umull v1.4s, v1.4h, v2.4h
+; CHECK-NEXT: umull2 v4.4s, v0.8h, v2.8h
+; CHECK-NEXT: umull v0.4s, v0.4h, v2.4h
+; CHECK-NEXT: uzp2 v1.8h, v1.8h, v3.8h
+; CHECK-NEXT: uzp2 v0.8h, v0.8h, v4.8h
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+entry:
+ %zext = zext <16 x i8> %x to <16 x i16>
+ %div = udiv <16 x i16> %zext, splat (i16 3)
+ ret <16 x i16> %div
+}
+
+; sdiv with zext input
+define <16 x i16> @sdiv_v16i16_from_zext(<16 x i8> %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: sdiv_v16i16_from_zext:
+; CHECK: // %bb.0: // %entry
+; CHECK-NEXT: mov w8, #21846 // =0x5556
+; CHECK-NEXT: ushll2 v1.8h, v0.16b, #0
+; CHECK-NEXT: ushll v0.8h, v0.8b, #0
+; CHECK-NEXT: dup v2.8h, w8
+; CHECK-NEXT: umull2 v3.4s, v1.8h, v2.8h
+; CHECK-NEXT: umull v1.4s, v1.4h, v2.4h
+; CHECK-NEXT: umull2 v4.4s, v0.8h, v2.8h
+; CHECK-NEXT: umull v0.4s, v0.4h, v2.4h
+; CHECK-NEXT: uzp2 v1.8h, v1.8h, v3.8h
+; CHECK-NEXT: uzp2 v0.8h, v0.8h, v4.8h
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+entry:
+ %zext = zext <16 x i8> %x to <16 x i16>
+ %div = sdiv <16 x i16> %zext, splat (i16 3)
+ ret <16 x i16> %div
+}
+
+; udiv exact with zext input
+define <16 x i16> @udiv_exact_v16i16_from_zext(<16 x i8> %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: udiv_exact_v16i16_from_zext:
+; CHECK: // %bb.0: // %entry
+; CHECK-NEXT: mov w8, #43691 // =0xaaab
+; CHECK-NEXT: ushll v2.8h, v0.8b, #0
+; CHECK-NEXT: ushll2 v0.8h, v0.16b, #0
+; CHECK-NEXT: dup v3.8h, w8
+; CHECK-NEXT: mul v1.8h, v0.8h, v3.8h
+; CHECK-NEXT: mul v0.8h, v2.8h, v3.8h
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+entry:
+ %zext = zext <16 x i8> %x to <16 x i16>
+ %div = udiv exact <16 x i16> %zext, splat (i16 3)
+ ret <16 x i16> %div
+}
+
+; sdiv exact with zext input
+define <16 x i16> @sdiv_exact_v16i16_from_zext(<16 x i8> %x) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: sdiv_exact_v16i16_from_zext:
+; CHECK: // %bb.0: // %entry
+; CHECK-NEXT: mov w8, #21846 // =0x5556
+; CHECK-NEXT: ushll2 v1.8h, v0.16b, #0
+; CHECK-NEXT: ushll v0.8h, v0.8b, #0
+; CHECK-NEXT: dup v2.8h, w8
+; CHECK-NEXT: umull2 v3.4s, v1.8h, v2.8h
+; CHECK-NEXT: umull v1.4s, v1.4h, v2.4h
+; CHECK-NEXT: umull2 v4.4s, v0.8h, v2.8h
+; CHECK-NEXT: umull v0.4s, v0.4h, v2.4h
+; CHECK-NEXT: uzp2 v1.8h, v1.8h, v3.8h
+; CHECK-NEXT: uzp2 v0.8h, v0.8h, v4.8h
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+entry:
+ %zext = zext <16 x i8> %x to <16 x i16>
+ %div = sdiv exact <16 x i16> %zext, splat (i16 3)
+ ret <16 x i16> %div
+}
Is this ready to merge? HEAD's been broken for quite a while now.
Is this ready to merge? HEAD's been broken for quite a while now.
I believe it is. @topperc @arsenm Can you please take another look?