llvm-iwg
llvm-iwg copied to clipboard
publishing biweekly status reports
converting the discussion on the mailing list into an issue:
I would like to propose that we start publishing biweekly status reports for the community on all the outstanding infrastructure projects that are going on.
The way I envision this working is that during the Tuesday meeting we would ask for a volunteer to do the status report (due the following Tuesday). That volunteer would contact each project owner and ask for current status and then produce a report that we commit to the llvm-iwg repo and email the mailing lists.
What do you think about this?
I think the current projects / owners we have outstanding are:
Discourse / Tanya Lattner Bugzilla / Anton Korobeynikov Code Review / Tom Stellard
I'd like to collect data and write the biweekly. I have two questions:
- what questions should be included in the mails that the owners received?
- There is several holidays ahead, the response from community members or owners may postponed. Do we want to wait until we get enough feedback, or should I publish the biweekly on a fixed date since next week?
@lazyparser Are you interested in doing status reports for this week?
@lazyparser Are you interested in doing status reports for this week?
no problem. will do.
thx, let us know if we can help with that in any way
Update:
In the past two weeks I did not collect enough feedback from project owners. I think we may have to postpone the report in two weeks, and wait for more feedback.
update from meeting on 2022-05-10:
- no major ongoing efforts, no need for communication right now
- @ChristianKuehnel to check the status/announcements around a Pull Request decision