ARFlow
ARFlow copied to clipboard
What is the difference between correlation package and correlation native implementation
I'm having issues using the correlation package. So, I was thinking of the native implementation you've provided. I would like to understand the differences between them.
- Is the difference just that one is implemented in c++ and the other in python, but both do the exact same things and are identical in performance?
- Is it just that the correlation package is faster than native implementation, but the accuracy will be the same?
- Or is it that the correlation package achieves better performance (both speed and accuracy) than the native implementation? If so, how wide is the gap?
I would love to know this too @lliuz