ljedrz
ljedrz
A no-change PR; I'm closing it, unless it's some push mistake (in which case feel free to correct it and reopen).
Cc https://github.com/AleoHQ/snarkVM/issues/986.
Happy to tackle this one, just a few questions: - could we persist the proposal to a file instead? it's probably better suited for this use case - what should...
> 1. Preferably the proposal goes to the same DB, in case the validator needs to migrate machines or directories. So a file is not ideal. We could store it...
Ah yes, the value is not an issue, it's more the key that is not really meaningful for a single blob, and while it can be worked around, my only...
Ok, so if `nogossip` is set, the node will not be requesting more peers; shouldn't this also mean that the node doesn't "shuffle" its peers, so that it doesn't lose...
Hello; what's the bug? Connectivity issues? Please fix the title and include information required in the issue template.
> Can this be per IP? There is a [crate](https://crates.io/crates/tower_governor) that facilitates this, but it doesn't seem like it's widely used or well-maintained; the current version is `0.0.4` and the...
The rate-limiting in this PR is not related to the source IP - it's a limit applicable to the entire REST server, to avoid a DDoS angle. However, if we...