Lixin Wei

I see, thank you for your explanation! I think rebalancing between workers is necessary. It will help the total throughput.

Could anyone have a look?

@werkt Thank you for your reply! But this action can be executed successfully in local mode. I'm wondering why the remote worker disables the write access to the cache folder,...

> You could in this instance simply not execute this action remotely, instead using tags = ["local"] on the rule definition. Oh that's a good tag, I can work around...

@HighCommander4 Thanks for the clarification! But I'm still wondering why we can't cache the AST in disk? So we don't need to parse it again.

@HighCommander4 I see. I think we should provide an option for the cache size of preambles, instead of expiring it immediately after closing. That will make more sense.

> I do wonder if such a cache would be useful in practice -- it's very possible that, depending on the cache size, it would either fill up too quickly...

@lightmelodies Awesome! What you did is exactly the 'AST cache' that I'm talking about with @HighCommander4, you just didn't implement functionalities like determining whether a previously built preamble is "up...

@HighCommander4 So in conclusion, I think it is worth it to implement this cache. What do you think? Could you please give me some guidance on how to experiment with...

@zxlhhyccc 哦哦，那就不改了，能请教下为啥要加个g吗？