ALFNet icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
ALFNet copied to clipboard

The MR is not as good as that in the paper.

Open Chen94yue opened this issue 7 years ago • 9 comments
trafficstars

I have trained the proposed model on my server with P40 GPU. The MR on Cityperson val dataset is 18% with one GPU (16% for two). Where might the problem arise?

Chen94yue avatar Oct 08 '18 02:10 Chen94yue

i have the similar problem that using alfnet-2s, i spent 2s on per image , so it's hard to acheive 20fps with gtx 1080ti. what's the problem ?

rintiunse avatar Oct 09 '18 02:10 rintiunse

I modified the parameters according to the paper description. The MR decreased to 20.20%.

Chen94yue avatar Oct 10 '18 06:10 Chen94yue

@Chen94yue Sorry for delayed reply. Did you decrease the learning rate and load the trained weights to continue training?

VideoObjectSearch avatar Oct 15 '18 13:10 VideoObjectSearch

@rintiunse Sorry for delayed reply. Did you make sure that your tensorflow is running on GPU? I just re-run the exact experiments 4 times. It approximately took 126~132 seconds on 500 images of 1024x2048 pixels on CityPersons validation set. 20fps is achieved on Caltech with images of 480x640 pixels as stated in the paper.

VideoObjectSearch avatar Oct 15 '18 13:10 VideoObjectSearch

@Chen94yue Sorry for delayed reply. Did you decrease the learning rate and load the trained weights to continue training?

No, I didn't. Let me have a try.

Chen94yue avatar Oct 17 '18 03:10 Chen94yue

@liuwei16 @VideoObjectSearch Could you update the original code for the following functions? from .utils.cython_bbox import bbox_overlaps from .utils.bbox import box_op The compiled code didn't work because different version of tensorflow.

Also, could you give a detailed description on how to train models? I run many times but also couldn't reproduce as good results as you did.

baiyancheng20 avatar Oct 17 '18 04:10 baiyancheng20

@VideoObjectSearch im sure that i run the code on GPU(1080TI). But it still spent 2s per image(CityPersons).

rintiunse avatar Oct 20 '18 09:10 rintiunse

@Chen94yue Sorry for delayed reply. Did you decrease the learning rate and load the trained weights to continue training?

I have a problem that what the end total loss value should be?

wsz912 avatar Oct 25 '18 03:10 wsz912

@Chen94yue Sorry for delayed reply. Did you decrease the learning rate and load the trained weights to continue training?

I have a problem that what the end total loss value should be? I haven't finished training yet. I'm not sure.

Chen94yue avatar Oct 25 '18 07:10 Chen94yue