Florin Lipan
Florin Lipan
@TristanCacqueray yes, definitely interested. I think the only challenge would be around handling the `Body`. PRs welcome :upside_down_face:
@threema-donat can you share some of the breaking tests or some minimal code to reproduce this? did you manage to fix the tests for 1.3.1 and if so, what did...
@punkeel I assume the reason was using the sync methods instead of the async ones inside async tests, right? This is one of the reasons I mention the error in...
What does the `Z` option do exactly? Could you link to some documentation please?
Sorry for the late reply but I don't intend to provide Podman support. It's a small project and I don't want to have too many corner cases to deal with...
@pm4rcin I meant that about my project/repo, not podman :wink:
Added in https://github.com/lipanski/docker-static-website/commit/96845997e4806d5191f0fed0df8122dbc177e30d
Where are you missing it? Also note that async methods can't handle `#[track_caller]` properly yet - see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/110011
Once that feature lands in stable, I'll gladly add the annotations.
@nyurik sounds interesting but I think I would have to introduce a new type `TcpServer` (and `UdpServer`) since otherwise the validation rules on the existing and new matchers would get...