Valentin

Hi @Borjis131! I understand your concern and issue! As such, I've created a tag 20240521: https://github.com/HewlettPackard/PacketRusher/releases/tag/20240521 Does it solve your issue for the time being? Sadly, PacketRusher is not yet...

Hi @IgnacioCTO, Thanks for the report! That's basically what https://github.com/HewlettPackard/PacketRusher/issues/31 is about, but we are not sure yet the best way to design the UX. If you any wishes on...

Hi @IgnacioCTO, Thank you for your feedback! Sadly, none of the three points are possible right now. You can open features requests for 1 and 3, as we definitely need...

Good morning to you as well @IgnacioCTO! Yes, for now and for your use cases, I would recommend you to have multiple containers of PacketRusher (either in Docker/Podman or in...

Hi @yoursunny; Thank you for your suggestion! For 1., point taken, thanks for the suggestion. In that case, automatic routes creation should probably also be disabled when VRF are disabled....

https://github.com/mum4k/termdash

https://github.com/SIPp/sipp

This should be fixed in https://github.com/HewlettPackard/PacketRusher ;-) @lakshmankumar12

Hi @osamirabo, In the meanwhile, does it work if you configure your network functions with sd: "ffffff" Valentin

Hi @hug0lin! Thanks for opening this issue. This is weird as PacketRusher definitely supports Registration using SUCI (null-scheme encoded SUPI as SUCI without any Profile A or Profile B encryption...