No Firefox Add-on

[rat10]

The links to the Firefox Add-on are broken and search in the Firefox Add-on repositiry for "Dokieli" finds no editor. I'm using Firefox 60 on MacOS.

[csarven]

Thanks for reporting.

I think this is a duplicate of https://github.com/linkeddata/dokieli/issues/231 . Please see my response in the comments. Basically possible to install it in Firefox but just not available from AMO ( https://addons.mozilla.org ) yet.

We need to have a closer look at some of the things mentioned here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/AMO/Policy/Reviews

The last review mentioned:

The following information is needed to complete your review:

1. This version contains obfuscated, minified, concatenated or otherwise machine-generated code. Please provide the original sources, together with instructions on how to generate the final XPI. Source code must be provided as an archive and uploaded using the source code upload field, which can be done during submission or on the version page in the developer hub. Please read through the instructions at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/Source_Code_Submission. If sources have not been provided within 7 days, this version will be rejected and removed from our queues. More Information: https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2016/04/05/improved-review-time-with-links-to-sources/ Established libraries (eg: JQuery, bootstrap) do not require the inclusion of their sources.

and

The following information is needed to complete your review:

1. Please upload the sources as a zip file on addons.mozilla.org, a link to a github repository is unfortunately not enough. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/Source_Code_Submission

We didn't act quickly so it was taken down.

If you want to give this a shot so that dokieli core is AMO (mozilla WebExtension) friendly, that'd really be a great contribution. Maybe create specific issues eg. DOM building instead of innerHTML, towards that end, and we can close this issue? It wasn't clear to me whether that's absolutely required (for all JS involved) or only for the extension's scripts. The last review didn't mention that as an issue - libraries like MediumEditor use it but that wasn't mentioned as an issue for some reason. For dokieli's core scritps, that should be straight forward, but more problematic (and maybe even not really resolvable) for the additional libraries.

[rat10]

Thanks for the quick reply and you're right, it's a duplicate - sorry! Maybe comment the links accordingly as broken links quickly give an impression of staleness. Dokieli seems like a great project but at least for the coming months I can't commit to anything.

[AdrianSkar]

Hi! Is there any way to install it without being temporary?