dokieli
dokieli copied to clipboard
Addressing social implications of annotations and UX
[Originally discussed with @amyvdh ]
How do we enable and encourage positive behaviour?
Some concerns (in no particular order):
- How can harassment and abuse be prevented or handled?
- How would moderation or civil discourse work?
- How can a resource state that it gives consent to be annotated at fine granularity e.g., liking, bookmarking are permitted, resharing, replying are not?
- How can the conditions to annotate be indicated e.g., the reply should be notified at inbox A, and have a copy sent also to inbox B?
- How can another resource's annotation policy/rules be respected e.g., some resource opts-out of annotations, so dokieli shouldn't be in-reply-to?
- How can anonymity, pseudonymity, individual, and global identity be factored in?
- How can domain expertise or reputation be factored in?
To what extent can or should these be solved within dokieli?
Please add your concerns. Share with interested/affected parties.
Involving page owners in annotation is a summary of "conversations around the issue of author preferences and consent only" at hypothes.is.