Addressing social implications of annotations and UX

[csarven]

[Originally discussed with @amyvdh ]

How do we enable and encourage positive behaviour?

Some concerns (in no particular order):

• How can harassment and abuse be prevented or handled?
• How would moderation or civil discourse work?
• How can a resource state that it gives consent to be annotated at fine granularity e.g., liking, bookmarking are permitted, resharing, replying are not?
• How can the conditions to annotate be indicated e.g., the reply should be notified at inbox A, and have a copy sent also to inbox B?
• How can another resource's annotation policy/rules be respected e.g., some resource opts-out of annotations, so dokieli shouldn't be in-reply-to?
• How can anonymity, pseudonymity, individual, and global identity be factored in?
• How can domain expertise or reputation be factored in?

To what extent can or should these be solved within dokieli?

Please add your concerns. Share with interested/affected parties.

[csarven]

Involving page owners in annotation is a summary of "conversations around the issue of author preferences and consent only" at hypothes.is.