ligi

Thanks for looking into this! Summoning Antoine Herzog (@antoineherzog), Pedro Gomes (@pedrouid), Joel Thorstensson (@oed) - the authors of this CAIP I less think the routing scheme is a problem...

Just stumbled over this great video - made my day

Sorry missed the discord message. Had a short look - looks good and I think we should do it. Just some nits: * the repo name has a double alliance....

great - I created: https://github.com/ChainAgnostic/CASA so you can PR your stuff there. Not a big fan of the typeform thing tbh: a) we should not ask for government aliases b)...

Also adding this as additional context: https://github.com/w3c/did-spec-registries/pull/73#discussion_r448440720

I was in another session in parallel - just reading up on [the notes](https://github.com/ChainAgnostic/AMS-CASA-gathering/issues/16)- would be great to discuss this in the next call. While I see where this is...

linking this discussion mentioned in the call: https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs/issues/1678 and I suggest: caip://2/eip155:1 ^^^ scheme ^ authority (CAIP number) ^^^^^^^^ path (CAIP content) this might be less correct AFAIR (need to...

> @pedrouid I didn't get a chance to comment on your other CAIP for getSupportedChains should we leave the window open for longer? It is kind of a trade-off "waiting...

is this for zksync 1.0 or 2.0?

I dropped him a mail - was too late for the meeting yesterday - but maybe we can have him at the next one - would also love to see...