pandoc-crossref
pandoc-crossref copied to clipboard
lierdakil
Pandoc filter for cross-references
Following situation: I have a rather complex table, rendered as SVG. Can it be added via `{#tbl:resultTable}` to have a caption on top of the figure and reference it...
`pandoc-crossref` works great! But would it be possible to add support for cross-referencing footnotes. Perhaps, like so: > A statement that just requires a footnote.^[An inline note]{#note:label} > > Another...
Typically I need multiple reference types: diagrams, music examples, poem examples, maps, etc. In LaTeX there are several ways to create custom reference types. Is this possible with pandoc-crossref or...
Currently, the search order for global configuration files is as follows, but could you add a search setting that looks for the specified file under a specified directory like `.pandoc-crossref/`?...
I'm trying to render a Markdown document as PDF using pandoc. It includes subfigures and cross-references. When producing the PDF, I get this error message: ``` ! LaTeX Error: Environment...
Is this possible with pandoc-crossref? I tried setting ``` loftitle: "List of figures" lotTitle: "List of tables" ``` with no effect.
This would be a great improvement! Especially for LaTeX users I imagine :)
I am converting from LaTeX to HTML5 and trying to use pandoc-crossref version 2.14.02 for cross references to figures, tables, listings and equations. I managed to get it to work...
In the top of this repo's README [pandoc-crossref filter](https://github.com/lierdakil/pandoc-crossref#pandoc-crossref-filter-) it states: > Optionally, you can use cleveref for LaTeX/PDF output, e.g. [cleveref PDF](http://lierdakil.github.io/pandoc-crossref/demo/output-cref.pdf), [cleveref LaTeX](http://lierdakil.github.io/pandoc-crossref/demo/output-cref.latex), and listings package, e.g. [listings...
Work towards #84. ~~At the time of writing, tests pass, but scoping rules remain unimplemented and code really needs some clean-up. Also,~~ worth mentioning that coverage isn't 100%, so some...
