Gergo Huszty

@lucacome Thanks for the details! Generally I agree with the dedicated instanceusage and the decomposition as much as possible with containers/microservices. The project where I would use this feature is...

another happy tester for debian/podman here! 😄

> I think he meant he was happy to test, not that he had it working already. :) Exactly 😄 . I am planning to migrate a legacy email server...

Thanks! I did not find out so far why the tests are failing on this branch. I tried it on Arch.

@synchronizing Wow what an old PR 😄. I am currently not using this project, and neither my improved fork. @atmoz might comment on the future of this PR.

Thanks @thomastaylor312 . Waiting for others concerns on the design.

Do we allow the ```--recursive``` option to untar the dependencies? It would be essential I think. Or should we also introduce also some ```--untar``` option as well for this command,...

Yes, I am going to submit PR for this. So you think ```--recursive``` shall by-default untar things?

@devlounge See the status in the [PR](https://github.com/kubernetes/helm/pull/2278) here. We are stuck at the point where some tests are needed. Would you mind to test the PR branch with your charts?

/remove-lifecycle rotten