Levon Saldamli
Levon Saldamli
Proposing a new flag, `--list-of-files-or-dirs`, to compliment the positional `file_or_dir` argument
Just want to point out that it would be nice if the contents of the file could be the output of `pytest --collect-only -q`, e.g. one line of the input...
Using spock 1.0. ons 26 aug 2015 kl. 17:36 skrev Chris Berry [email protected]: > It should be catching and retrying those tests. Which version of Spock are > you running?...
Just realized the timeout happens in an "at" section called from a base spec setup method. ons 26 aug 2015 kl. 17:39 skrev Levon Saldamli [email protected]: > Using spock 1.0....
I think the retry code even doesn't catch errors in `setup` methods? Here is the full stack trace: ``` geb.waiting.WaitTimeoutException: condition did not pass in 20.0 seconds (failed with exception)...
I tried to fix this but no success. There are interceptors in SpecInfo, e.g. iterationInterceptor, but failures from tests does not propagate to them. There is however setupInterceptors which might...
It does catch the error and retries, but doesn't cleanup and setup everything from start, i.e. no navigation happens while retrying. I guess the problem is to know which cleanup...
Is there any progress on this issue? Or a workaround (other than `#type:ignore` :) ) ?
> I didn't see this issue until now. Is #53 what you're hoping for? Yes! An overview of failed tests with expandable tracebacks is really helpful when find and fixing...
I created https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/14003 before I found this issue, with a minimal example. I think a user expects tests to fail and not be silently ignored, where the names of the...
That's a good tip, thank you!