Christoffer Lerno
Christoffer Lerno
I forgot about this. This works properly for CONSTANT checks, but not runtime checks, and this was because the macros were the first ones to get checking and at the...
This is kind of a lot, so I need some time for it.
Let's do this next cycle.
My proposed change would do the following: 1. Bake the `-` so that the check is on the actual value. 2. Negative numbers are always signed. 3. Hex/oct/binary will use...
Any opinion on this @chqrlie
I'll close it then.
The `-1` parsing solves the problem of being able to write INT_MIN without the type being promoted to long. Consider `sizeof(-2147483648)` in C. This one returns 8, while `sizeof(-2147483647)` returns...
Since we continue the discussion, let me reopen this.
> what is the type of -0x1 ? int > do we have sizeof(-2147483648) != sizeof(- 2147483648) ? No. > if you ever though of adding the exponentiation operator \*\*,...