Christoffer Lerno
Christoffer Lerno
Removed already added ones.
Removed added ones
I think most don't support avx512 actually. The next level to this is to: (1) have built in "overloading" on avx support that which are runtime switched (there are actually...
Feel free to vote on this one using 👍 and 👎
3 is ambiguous. 4 would need special parsing.
An alternative uses `=>` ```c fn int square(int x) => return x * x; fn void foo(int y) => baz(y); fn int square(int x) => x * x; fn void...
I'm trying to reserve "->" in case it's needed later, plus the problem of that operator when converting C code.
Two variants are now available for test: ```c fn int square(int x) = x * x; fn int square(int x) => x * x; ``` See if it actually adds...
`=` is more likely to be adopted than `=>`
I do as well, but at least in the case for D that means an actual grammar, which then needs to be different depending on processor. If we look at...