Christoffer Lerno
Christoffer Lerno
I want to avoid adding things *merely* for the convenience of C bindings. Is there some other use for this?
You could do: ```c enum CBool : CInt { FALSE, TRUE } ``` And now your call becomes: ```c foo(TRUE); foo(FALSE); ```
Done!
See if it works as expected.
Yes, I think this will be fixed when I get to code formatting.
Feel free to add a pull request to support 3.4 as well. You can look at how this is done with opengl to support different versions.
Yes, I think we should probably think of bindings as a two step process: 1. The full bindings, trying to match things 1:1 so that people can get started just...
I think that eventually, we'll probably have to have someone who goes through all the bindings and make sure they're consistent in style, but that's more as we go towards...
So, as you've already heard, this is not a thing to be included as it is. Generally the path shortening in C3 is intended to automatically create aliases for you,...
So I'm going to close this, but is positive to adding an `alias some_path = module foo::bar` or something similar. The exact syntax should be worked out, so if you...