Leonard Brünings

I now use a barebones Jetty implementation as a workaround. ```groovy Server server = new Server(0) server.setHandler(new AbstractHandler() { @Override void handle(String target, Request baseRequest, HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response) throws...

Moved back to draft, as this way it should be implemented makes state sharing hard, and it would be solved if we can add a store similar to Spock. https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/issues/3047

What I can observe with `id("org.openapi.generator") version "6.0.1"`, is that if you define a schema ```yaml components: schemas: CustomQuery: allOf: - type: object required: - container properties: container: type: string...

@cbeust if you are really worried that a fix would break existing users, would you consider introducing a new listener interface, that has the "correct" behavior, or introduce a new...

Any chance this will be merged?

@jhy was on holiday myself, but wanted to check in and see if there is anything you want changed for the PR?

@jhy since you are back, could you take a look at this.

@jhy any chance this might get merged, then I would fix it, otherwise I'd release it as a standalone variant? I would strongly prefer this to be part of jsoup...

For those that are interested, here is a standalone release https://github.com/1and1/jsoup-hamcrest However, I'd still like to merge it so it can be part of the official jsoup.

@jhy sure, just tell me when you've taken a more in-depth look and would like to merge it, then I can see about updating the pr.