Lemonyte

> what are your thought about the previous PRs we received? Worth reworking them in this PR? I would be happy to do that, or if you prefer I could...

So far nothing in any of the PRs are breaking changes (type hints, formatting, and an added argument to the `AsyncBase` class). I will integrate #14 #68 and #70 into...

That is true. In that case it may be worth changing the package behavior slightly as described in my [original comment](https://github.com/deta/deta-python/pull/69#issue-1182373712) since it is a breaking change as well.

A few questions: - For type hints is `typing.Optional` preferred for all the optional arguments (where `None` is the default value)? - Should I add an argument for an external...

> is this the pythonic way of doing it? It is good practice to explicitly specify that a parameter type can be `None` when its default value is a literal...

Update: - Improved type hints across all files - Added overloads for some methods - Minor refactoring changes - Combined `fetch()` and `_fetch()` methods in `_Base()` class - Minor changes...

@abdelhai it seems the checks are failing due to missing project keys. Can you check the workflow secrets?

The blocker here is that a plain version of the icon would look like a plain circle. I don't want to move forward with modifications to the icon without approval...

> I can try to upload an example soon so you can see if you want Sure! I should have been more clear: I'm open to discuss modifications, but would...

Hi @Snailedlt, what are your thoughts on merging this? I believe all the issues have been resolved here.