Arnaud J Le Hors

Although I like @bestbeforetoday's idea of using branches in principle I have to agree with @denyeart that this is probably too much of a pain to manage in practice. I'm...

> Final thought, is adding a new level appropriate for a minor release, or should we consider a major release for this? We've talked about this on Monday's call actually....

> Hey all, in an effort to unblock merging of _this_ PR, so that other issues can be addressed individually (and hopefully more quickly?) I've put together [this document](https://docs.google.com/document/d/13Xt8mA_2b00McGX2vkyhu4GQdFAqtXPu7YXE8ZA6ISE/edit?usp=sharing&resourcekey=0-EqfHF79tUWAKp4PzsE3z1A) (request...

> Overall looks fine, see my comments above. Thanks @david-a-wheeler for your careful review, I've accepted all your proposed changes.

@david-a-wheeler can you please approve so this can be merged? Thank you.

@afmarcum I'm not sure Melba will respond so I'll do it for her: we can close this.

> If we could establish an ear mark based on project maturity it may also help encourage TIs to complete the pre-requisite tasks to "unlock" marketing dollars for swag. >...

> Would this summary be in addition to the quarterly presentation? My proposal is to merely use the report on GitHub. I structured the template based on the presentation that...

> Since this is a Content PR, we might want to add a CHANGELOG file in this PR to start following the [TAC decision process](https://github.com/ossf/tac/blob/main/process/TAC-Decision-Process.md#pull-request-types)? Sounds good to me. @SecurityCRob...

To be clear: this is about submitting an OpenSSF specification to a formal standards body such as JTC1. I agree that we should decide what approval this requires. I don't...