Fabrice Le Fessant
Fabrice Le Fessant
Thanks for noticing! I think we should keep this issue as a reminder to check that the README and CHANGELOG are correctly filled before the beta release.
FWIW, the subject is not whether we keep some package interfaces or not, we will get rid of all of them for readability and navigation issues. The question is more...
Unfortunately, I don't think I can protect the branches as the sync process pushes directly into these branches. I am going to push a base branch (maybe with another name...
It's a bit weird, I didn't do anything different from the previous `gnucobol` repo, committer translation was better done the first time. Ok, I will need to investigate what changed...
I added a test in `used_binaries.at`... and most arguments used by `gcc` that make sense for GnuCOBOL. I don't know which changes are being done in `gcc`, but I can...
@GitMensch I have a completely unrelated question ; I have a PR on the manual in https://github.com/OCamlPro/gnucobol-docs/pull/2 . Is there another maintainer for that part, or are you also in...
So, in this version, I am using the `COB_IS_RUNNING_IN_TESTMODE` variable to replace backslashes by slashes in the compiler output, so that tests have the same results on Unix and Windows.
> > Should `-MM` and `-MMD` be added, ignoring the copybooks in `COB_COPY_DIR` (currently extfh and screenio)? I don't think it is worth it. Though they are easy to implement...
This version has a `NEWS` section and a new section in `gnucobol.texi` for dependency options.
@GitMensch I think I have replied and/or fixed all your points, is it for merge ?