Marnick L'Eau
Marnick L'Eau
So I gather from you bringing that up that what we want would be a new feature, it's not really that we're missing something. Was afraid of that... I might...
I believe this thread is a dupe of #88
> have our hands full just keeping up with the volume of PRs sorry :p
So in essence, rather than having your list values joined by `,`, you want to be able to specify a custom prefix, infix, and suffix for BindList to use, right?
I think we can patch `SqlStatement#bindThis(String, List)` to support this:  The extra strings can be passed to the method from the fluent API, and `@BindList` can get extra `prefix...
I find it a bit strange that just adding the word `VALUES` before your value list makes any difference in performance. Does it just create different memory structures or activate...
We could perhaps make it a `jdbi3-postgres` specialization of `bindList` to render with `VALUES`, maybe with a count threshold if performance actually suffers with small lists (or so users of...
Do you have a vision of what that support might look like to a user?
I don't think any of us will actively develop new features for jdbi2, it's legacy. PRs can always be submitted though.
Yeah, sorry, I removed my remark again, I don't feel focused enough to speak confidently about async stuff