Mark Jansen
Mark Jansen
> I will take a look. I created a suggestion how to fix it: #3016 The change for that should be fairly simple, as long as there is consensus on...
> Yes, contribution welcome. > > What would speak against re-using HandleCursorPos / GotCursorShape ? > > What would a testcase look like? > > No example needed. `HandleCursorPos` can...
> > `HandleCursorPos` can be used as-is, but the `GotCursorShape` will need to interpret data differently. > > * maybe it makes sense to introduce additional callbacks just to be...
Thanks for the fast responses, this is a great incentive to contribute!
This is less compatible as I hoped. One of the cursors is fine [(cursor type 1)](https://github.com/rfbproto/rfbproto/blob/master/rfbproto.rst#7722vmware-cursor-pseudo-encoding). The other one (cursor type 0) needs custom drawing code: ```c dst[i] = (dst[i]...
Until this reaches a more usable state, I don't think it makes sense to merge this. If you feel there is a good reason to do so, or we are...