feat(Analysis.Normed.Module.Milman-Pettis): add Milman-Pettis theorem
PR summary 45f9a2993d
Import changes for modified files
No significant changes to the import graph
Import changes for all files
| Files | Import difference |
|---|---|
Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Milman-Pettis (new file) |
1901 |
Declarations diff
+ IsClosed_image_ball
+ LinearIsometryEquiv_of_uniformConvexSpace
+ WeakClosure_subset_closedBall
+ WeakSpace.closure_subset
+ WeakSpace.isOpen_of_isClosed
+ double_dual_norm_eq
+ exists_ball_lt
+ exists_forall_closedBall_dist_lt
+ exists_forall_sphere_dist_lt
+ exists_functional_sub_one_lt
+ exists_nnorm_eq_one_lt_apply_of_lt_opNorm
+ exists_nnorm_eq_one_lt_apply_of_lt_opNorm'
+ instance : Module.IsReflexive ℝ E
+ milman_pettis
+ sphere_subset_closure
+ sphere_subset_image
+ surjective_iff_closedBall_subset_range
+ surjective_iff_sphere_subset_range
+ surjective_of_uniformConvexSpace
You can run this locally as follows
## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh <optional_commit>
## more verbose report:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh long <optional_commit>
The doc-module for script/declarations_diff.sh contains some details about this script.
No changes to technical debt.
You can run this locally as
./scripts/technical-debt-metrics.sh pr_summary
- The
relativevalue is the weighted sum of the differences with weight given by the inverse of the current value of the statistic. - The
absolutevalue is therelativevalue divided by the total sum of the inverses of the current values (i.e. the weighted average of the differences).
Can you also update 1000.yaml once you finish proving the theorem? Completing a named theorem should be celebrated appropriately :-)
Can you also update
1000.yamlonce you finish proving the theorem? Completing a named theorem should be celebrated appropriately :-)
Sure, good idea! As you see, I've just started off this morning (mainly as a training exercice towards our joint work) so it's still a long way to go. But I will certainly add it there when done!
Here is a proof for Goldstine theorem and several lemmas.
Thanks! I will incorporate this very soon (probably next week) and will ping you so that you can have a look.