Rename `use_design_system_item` to something more accurate

[bartekpacia]

I think the name of the use_design_system_item lint rule is too specific for what it is actually capable of. It can be used for classes that are not related to design system (though I agree it's the most common use case, and the migration cost probably outweights the (lack of) benefits).

[shilangyu]

What name would you suggest? I am open to changing it if we come up with a good name

[bartekpacia]

This lint rule essentially accepts a list of classes, I think the lint name should reflect this – i.e. the name should contain a plural:

Some ideas:

• class_replacements/replace_classes
• type_replacements/replace_types (this lint also works for enums/typedefs, right?)
• custom_type_replacements

Here's what ChatGPT generated

[leventkantaroglu]

I suggest the 'avoid-banned-phase-usage' name for this rule. use_design_system_item is a limiting name. I think any alternative is more preferable